Adobe AD0-E902 Online Version - Related AD0-E902 Exams

Blog Article

Tags: AD0-E902 Online Version, Related AD0-E902 Exams, Latest AD0-E902 Guide Files, Valid AD0-E902 Exam Objectives, AD0-E902 Practice Test Pdf

By unremitting effort to improve the accuracy and being studious of the AD0-E902 real questions all these years, our experts remain unpretentious attitude towards our AD0-E902 practice materials all the time. They are unsuspecting experts who you can count on. Without unintelligible content within our AD0-E902 Study Tool, all questions of the exam are based on their professional experience in this industry. Besides, they made three versions for your reference, the PDF, APP and Online software version.

Adobe AD0-E902 Exam Syllabus Topics:

Topic	Details
Topic 1	Testing and Error Handling: This section of the exam measures the skills of Quality Assurance Engineers and evaluates the principles of testing and error handling in Fusion. Candidates must define test plans and test cases, identify directives for handling unreliable services, and configure custom error handling mechanisms. One specific skill tested is applying the correct error-handling directive to manage service disruptions.
Topic 2	Working with APIs: This section of the exam measures the skills of Integration Specialists and assesses knowledge of API interactions within Fusion. Candidates must handle rate-limiting errors, identify ways to integrate third-party APIs and determine the correct module types when built-in functionalities are unavailable. One critical skill evaluated is implementing a solution for API rate limits to ensure seamless integration.
Topic 3	Scenario Design and Architecture: This section of the exam measures the skills of Solution Architects and focuses on designing and structuring Fusion scenarios efficiently. Candidates must determine the correct steps to parse JSON, perform data lookups, and distinguish between different triggers. Understanding system limitations, module selection, and timezone handling is also essential. One key skill assessed is identifying the appropriate method for uploading documents while managing access controls.
Topic 4	Foundational Technical Concepts: This section of the exam measures the skills of Fusion Developers and covers core technical concepts related to data transformation, function nesting, and expression formation in Fusion. Candidates must understand how to modify field formats, use appropriate functions, and work with data manipulation techniques. One key skill evaluated is selecting the correct function to transform data between different formats.

>> Adobe AD0-E902 Online Version <<

Latest Adobe Workfront Fusion Professional exam pdf, AD0-E902 practice exam

Once you purchase our AD0-E902 practice guide, you will find that our design is really carful and delicate. Every detail is perfect. For example, our windows software of the AD0-E902 study materials is really wonderful. The interface of our AD0-E902 learning braindumps is concise and beautiful. There are no extra useless things to disturb your learning of the AD0-E902 Training Questions. And as long as you click on the website, you will get quick information about what you want to know.

Adobe Workfront Fusion Professional Sample Questions (Q12-Q17):

NEW QUESTION # 12
A Fusion Developer receives frequent notifications that a specific Scenario has been stopped. Upon investigation, the developer notes that there is nothing wrong with the data or process in the scenario, but that the error always occurs on a specific module that calls a third-party system. The error recorded is consistently a service unavailable error, particularly during times of high network traffic to the target system.
Which action should the Fusion Developer take to reduce the number of times the scenario is automatically stopped by Fusion?

A. Update the Module settings to automatically ignore failed executions.
B. Add an additional route after the failing module with a repeater to retry errors.
C. Add an error handler to the Module and select a Break directive.
D. Update the Scenario settings to automatically retry failed executions.

Answer: D

Explanation:
In this scenario, the error consistently arises due to the unavailability of a third-party service during high traffic times. This is a temporary issue and does not indicate a problem with the data or process. The recommended approach in such cases is to configure the scenario to retry failed executions:
* Update Scenario Settings:
* In Workfront Fusion, you can configure scenarios to automatically retry a failed execution.
* This option ensures that temporary issues, like service unavailability, are retried after a delay, reducing the chances of the scenario being stopped permanently.
* This is particularly useful when dealing with network traffic spikes or third-party API throttling.
* Why Not Other Options?
* B. Update the Module settings to automatically ignore failed executions: Ignoring failed executions would cause incomplete or incorrect data to flow through the scenario, leading to potential downstream issues.
* C. Add an error handler to the Module and select a Break directive: While error handlers are useful, the Break directive stops the scenario from processing further, which is not ideal for a temporary issue.
* D. Add an additional route after the failing module with a repeater: Adding a repeater increases complexity and is unnecessary when the retry option is already available in scenario settings.
References:
* Adobe Workfront Fusion Documentation: Scenario Settings and Error Handling
* Experience League Community: Handling API Rate Limits and Errors in Workfront Fusion

NEW QUESTION # 13
A query returns a partial list of possible values.
Which flow control module should be used to ensure all the possible results are queried?

A. Repeater
B. Aggregator
C. Router
D. Iterator

Answer: A

Explanation:
* Understanding the Requirement:
* The query returns only a partial list of possible values.
* The task is to ensure that all results are processed by iterating through multiple queries or pages of data.
* Why Option B ("Repeater") is Correct:
* TheRepeatermodule is designed to repeat an operation a specified number of times or until a condition is met.
* It is commonly used for querying paginated data or when a system limits the number of records returned in a single request.
* In this case, the Repeater ensures all possible values are queried by making additional requests to retrieve subsequent pages or results.
* Why the Other Options are Incorrect:
* Option A ("Aggregator"):
* The Aggregator combines multiple data bundles into a single output. It does not handle iterative queries or pagination.
* Option C ("Iterator"):
* The Iterator splits an array into individual items for processing. It does not handle querying for additional data or looping through requests.
* Option D ("Router"):
* The Router splits the flow of a scenario into multiple paths based on conditions. It is unrelated to iterative querying.
* Steps to Configure the Repeater:
* Add theRepeatermodule to your scenario.
* Configure the number of repetitions or the condition to continue querying (e.g., based on the presence of additional data).
* Link the Repeater to the module responsible for retrieving the data, ensuring it processes all available results.
* How This Solves the Problem:
* The Repeater module ensures that all possible results are queried by iteratively sending requests until no more data is available.
References and Supporting Documentation:
* Adobe Workfront Fusion: Repeater Module Documentation
* Workfront Community: Using Flow Control Modules

NEW QUESTION # 14
What are two required elements of a test case? (Choose two.)

A. Source code being tested
B. Expected outcome of test
C. Clear procedure for completing the test
D. Name of test owner

Answer: B,C

Explanation:
* A. Expected Outcome of Test
* A test case must clearly state what the expected outcome is, providing a standard against which the results can be measured.
* This ensures testers can validate whether the scenario behaves as intended.
* C. Clear Procedure for Completing the Test
* A well-defined procedure outlines the exact steps required to execute the test, ensuring consistent and repeatable testing.
* This reduces ambiguity and helps identify whether errors are due to the scenario configuration or improper test execution.
* Why Not Other Options?
* B. Name of Test Owner: While helpful for accountability, the name of the test owner is not a required component of the test case itself.
* D. Source Code Being Tested: Fusion scenarios do not typically involve source code. Instead, the focus is on workflow execution and configuration, making this element irrelevant.
References:
* Workfront Training Materials: Test Case Design Best Practices
* Adobe Workfront Fusion Documentation: Testing and Debugging Scenarios

NEW QUESTION # 15
A Fusion scenario is triggered by a project status update. The scenario then updates the status, causing repeated execution of the scenario.
Which action should a user take to keep this from happening?

A. Schedule the instant trigger to only run at intervals to prevent Fusion from thinking the record has been updated after each run
B. When using instant triggers, finish the scenario with the Break directive to prevent the record from being updated again
C. Create a filter after the instant trigger that only passes records that have not been updated by Fusion

Answer: C

Explanation:
Step by Step Comprehensive Detailed Explanation:
* Understanding the Problem:
* The scenario is triggered by a project status update.
* After the scenario runs, it updates the project status again, which re-triggers the scenario, creating aloop.
* The goal is to prevent the scenario from re-triggering itself.
* Option Analysis:
* A. When using instant triggers, finish the scenario with the Break directive to prevent the record from being updated again:
* Incorrect. The Break directive is not used to prevent updates; it is used to stop further iterations of a scenario. It does not address the root cause of the loop, which is the re- triggering by updated records.
* B. Create a filter after the instant trigger that only passes records that have not been updated by Fusion:
* Correct. Adding a filter ensures that only records not recently updated by Fusion are processed. This prevents Fusion from re-triggering itself on the same record.
* For example, you could use a condition to check if the Last Updated By field does not equal the Fusion user or if the Last Update Date is older than a certain threshold.
* C. Schedule the instant trigger to only run at intervals to prevent Fusion from thinking the record has been updated after each run:
* Incorrect. Instant triggers are event-driven, and their purpose is to respond to changes immediately. Scheduling them would negate the benefit of instant triggers and does not solve the root problem.
* Why Filtering Records is Best:
* Targeted Control: A filter after the trigger ensures only relevant updates (e.g., those not caused by Fusion) are processed.
* Prevents Loops: By excluding records updated by Fusion, the scenario avoids re-triggering itself.
* Maintains Performance: Filtering prevents unnecessary processing of irrelevant records, improving efficiency.
* How to Implement:
* After the instant trigger module, add a filter module.
* Configure the filter to check the Last Updated By field or a custom flag indicating if the update was performed by Fusion.
* Example: Last Updated By # Fusion User or Update Flag # True.
* If a custom flag is used, ensure the flag is set when Fusion updates the record.
* Alternative Solutions:
* Add a custom field (e.g., "Updated by Fusion") that Fusion sets when it updates a record. This can also be used in the filter condition.
References:This approach aligns with Fusion best practices for preventing infinite loops caused by scenarios re-triggering themselves. Filtering ensures the scenario runs only when necessary, avoiding redundant processing and maintaining performance.

NEW QUESTION # 16
A global customer has end users who input date and currency data into fields in inconsistent formats. Despite continued training efforts, this continues to be an issue. Unfortunately, the third-party service that the end users are using does not support forcing a required field format. These input mistakes do not happen frequently, but they currently stop the scenario from executing after the default three retries.
In Fusion, which action can the admin take to ensure that errors are corrected after they occur in a scenario?

A. Set up an error handling path that will catch errors in the end user's inputs and message the users in an email update that they need to try again.
B. Use the switch module to catch dates not in the required format and convert the common misused patterns into the appropriate format to prevent the scenario from stopping after three failed executions.
C. Select storing of Incomplete Executions in the scenario settings. The customer admin can then filter and search the execution history to resolve errors as they occur.

Answer: C

Explanation:
* Understanding the Scenario:
* The issue involves end users inputting inconsistent date and currency formats that result in errors in a Workfront Fusion scenario.
* The default behavior of Fusion stops the scenario after three retries due to input mismatches or invalid formats.
* Why Option A is Correct:
* Storing Incomplete Executions: In Adobe Workfront Fusion, enabling "Store incomplete executions" in the scenario settings allows administrators to capture incomplete runs without fully stopping the entire process. This feature stores all relevant data, even from incomplete runs, allowing administrators to identify and correct input issues manually.
* Error Troubleshooting: By reviewing incomplete executions, admins can pinpoint where the scenario failed, resolve the issue, and potentially reprocess those incomplete records, preventing complete scenario stoppage.
* Why Option B is Incorrect:
* The "switch module" can handle specific input variations, but it is not a comprehensive solution for handling unexpected or inconsistent formats entered by end users. While it might mitigate some errors, it does not address the root cause and can miss unanticipated input patterns.
* Why Option C is Incorrect:
* Setting up an error handling path to notify users and request corrections adds an additional manual step for users but does not resolve the problem efficiently within Fusion. Moreover, this solution does not prevent the scenario from halting after retries.
* Steps to Enable Storing Incomplete Executions:
* Navigate to the scenario in Adobe Workfront Fusion.
* Open theScenario Settingsby clicking the gear icon.
* Enable the optionStore Incomplete Executionsunder Execution settings.
* Save the settings and activate the scenario.
* How This Solves the Problem:
* Enabling this setting ensures that no data is lost when the scenario fails due to inconsistent inputs.
Admins can access the incomplete executions through the scenario execution history, apply necessary corrections, and retry specific records or steps as needed.
References and Supporting Documentation:
* Adobe Workfront Fusion Official Documentation: Scenario Settings
* Workfront Community: Handling Incomplete Executions

NEW QUESTION # 17
......

We talked with a lot of users about AD0-E902 practice engine, so we are very clear what you want. You know that the users of AD0-E902 training materials come from all over the world. The quality of our products is of course in line with the standards of various countries. You will find that the update of AD0-E902 learning quiz is very fast. You don't have to buy all sorts of information in order to learn more. AD0-E902 training materials can meet all your needs. What are you waiting for?

Related AD0-E902 Exams: https://www.real4dumps.com/AD0-E902_examcollection.html

Report this page

ADOBE AD0-E902 ONLINE VERSION - RELATED AD0-E902 EXAMS

Adobe AD0-E902 Online Version - Related AD0-E902 Exams